EPYC 7573X vs i7-965 Extreme Edition
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 94 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.98 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Nehalem (2008−2010) | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 17 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 731 Million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and EPYC 7573X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 November 2008 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 32 |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 280 Watt |
i7-965 Extreme Edition has 115.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and AMD EPYC 7573X. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-965 Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
