Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Core i7-950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-950
2009, $290
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84
+328%
Core 2 Duo SL9400
2008, $284
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.43

Core i7-950 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21803208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.180.01
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.52no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date2 June 2009 (16 years ago)20 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$290$284

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-950 has 1700% better value for money than Core 2 Duo SL9400.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.06 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size263 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C105 °C
Number of transistors731 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V - 1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-950 1.84
+328%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-950 3250
+332%
Samples: 3309
Core 2 Duo SL9400 753
Samples: 182

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-950 3652
+70.3%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 2144

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-950 14558
+278%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 3850

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-950 8.05
+436%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 43.12

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-950 5143
+296%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1300

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-950 5
+369%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 0.43
Recency 2 June 2009 20 August 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

i7-950 has a 327.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Core 2 Duo SL9400, on the other hand, has 664.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-950 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-950
Core i7-950
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
Core 2 Duo SL9400

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 372 votes

Rate Core i7-950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-950 and Core 2 Duo SL9400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.