Xeon L5506 vs i7-940XM
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-940XM outperforms Xeon L5506 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2617 | 2647 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.00 | 0.88 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clarksfield (2009−2010) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 20 June 2010 (16 years ago) | 30 March 2009 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,096 | $125 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon L5506 has 1000% better value for money than i7-940XM.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 0.13 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 774 million | 731 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCPGA988,PGA988 | FCLGA1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | + |
| PAE | 36 Bit | 40 Bit |
Security technologies
Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 144 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 19.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | None | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-940XM and Xeon L5506.
| PCIe version | 2 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 1.28 |
| Recency | 20 June 2010 | 30 March 2009 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
i7-940XM has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 9% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i7-940XM and Intel Xeon L5506.
Be aware that Core i7-940XM is a notebook processor while Xeon L5506 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
