Xeon Gold 6538N vs i7-930

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-930
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.94
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
29.34
+1412%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms Core i7-930 by a whopping 1412% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1975162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2421.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.3613.05
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date28 February 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6538N has 8904% better value for money than i7-930.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4.8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size263 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size24 GB4 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-930 1.94
Xeon Gold 6538N 29.34
+1412%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-930 2963
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895
+1415%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 29.34
Recency 28 February 2010 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 205 Watt

i7-930 has 57.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6538N, on the other hand, has a 1412.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6538N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-930 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-930 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6538N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-930 and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-930
Core i7-930
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 207 votes

Rate Core i7-930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-930 or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.