Ryzen 3 3100 vs i7-920XM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920XM
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
1.14

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i7-920XM by a whopping 496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25251141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0233.70
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency0.884.42
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)24 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,054$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3100 has 168400% better value for money than i7-920XM.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size296 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors774 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version24.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-920XM 1.14
Ryzen 3 3100 6.79
+496%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-920XM 2002
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+496%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-920XM 373
Ryzen 3 3100 1492
+300%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-920XM 1064
Ryzen 3 3100 5099
+379%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-920XM 4322
Ryzen 3 3100 5181
+19.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-920XM 11916
Ryzen 3 3100 23406
+96.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-920XM 19
Ryzen 3 3100 6.58
+189%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-920XM 4
Ryzen 3 3100 11
+182%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 6.79
Recency 23 September 2009 24 April 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

i7-920XM has 18.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has a 495.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-920XM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-920XM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920XM
Core i7-920XM
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 46 votes

Rate Core i7-920XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1853 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-920XM and Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.