Ultra 7 265F vs i7-920XM

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency2.12no data
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date23 September 2009 (15 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$1,054no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size296 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988,PGA9881851
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version25.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

i7-920XM has 18.2% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-920XM is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920XM and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920XM
Core i7-920XM
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 25 votes

Rate Core i7-920XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920XM or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.