Xeon X3320 vs Core i7-920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.83
+43%

Core i7-920 outperforms Xeon X3320 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19052184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.220.23
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)no data
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340no data
Current price$65 (0.2x MSRP)$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-920 has 430% better value for money than Xeon X3320.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Bus support1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C71 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.83
+43%
Xeon X3320 1.28

Core i7-920 outperforms Xeon X3320 by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-920 2835
+42.7%
Xeon X3320 1986

Core i7-920 outperforms Xeon X3320 by 43% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 1.28
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3320 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-920 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3320 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and Xeon X3320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 385 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or Xeon X3320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.