FX-8370E vs i7-920

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-920
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.79
FX-8370E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.34
+86.6%

FX-8370E outperforms Core i7-920 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-920 and FX-8370E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20131571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.220.67
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.303.33
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$340$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-920 has 82% better value for money than FX-8370E.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-920 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C71 °C
Number of transistors731 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-920 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-920 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-920 and FX-8370E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-920 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-920 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-920 and FX-8370E.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-920 1.79
FX-8370E 3.34
+86.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-920 2837
FX-8370E 5306
+87%

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-920 3970
FX-8370E 7570
+90.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 3.34
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

FX-8370E has a 86.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-8370E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-920 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-920 and FX-8370E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-920
Core i7-920
AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 399 votes

Rate Core i7-920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-920 or FX-8370E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.