Core i5-7500 vs Core i7-8809G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8809G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 100 Watt
5.53
+34.5%

i7-8809G outperforms i5-7500 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11251372
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.67
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-G (2018)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$202

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier3134
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA2270FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
SIPPno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (1063 - 1190 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8809G 5.53
+34.5%
i5-7500 4.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8809G 8554
+34.5%
i5-7500 6362

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-8809G 1408
+9.8%
i5-7500 1282

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-8809G 4604
+30.9%
i5-7500 3517

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-8809G 8837
+21.9%
i5-7500 7247

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-8809G 6.57
+47.9%
i5-7500 9.72

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-8809G 9
+36.6%
i5-7500 7

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-8809G 865
+47.9%
i5-7500 585

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-8809G 179
+12.6%
i5-7500 159

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-8809G 1.99
+8.7%
i5-7500 1.83

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-8809G 4.8
+50%
i5-7500 3.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-8809G 5984
+101%
i5-7500 2979

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-8809G 53
+35.2%
i5-7500 39

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-8809G 200
+10.3%
i5-7500 182

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.53 4.11
Recency 7 January 2018 3 January 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

i7-8809G has a 34.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.

i5-7500, on the other hand, has 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-8809G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-8809G is a notebook processor while Core i5-7500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8809G and Core i5-7500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8809G
Core i7-8809G
Intel Core i5-7500
Core i5-7500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-8809G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1703 votes

Rate Core i5-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8809G or Core i5-7500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.