Intel Xeon E-2176M vs Core i7-8750H

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

i7-8750H
6.46

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 10% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking949897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data1.47
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon E
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date2 April 2018 (5 years old)2 April 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$395$450
Current price$824 (2.1x MSRP)$2916 (6.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache9 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440BGA-1440
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8750H 6.46
Xeon E-2176M 7.09
+9.8%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 10% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-8750H 9923
Xeon E-2176M 10887
+9.7%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 10% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-8750H 1298
Xeon E-2176M 1387
+6.9%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 7% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-8750H 4610
Xeon E-2176M 4945
+7.3%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-8750H 6471
Xeon E-2176M 6973
+7.8%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8750H 33595
+4.6%
Xeon E-2176M 32132

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8750H 10295
+5.5%
Xeon E-2176M 9757

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 6% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-8750H 5.48
Xeon E-2176M 5.34
+2.6%

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 3% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-8750H 12
+0.3%
Xeon E-2176M 12

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-8750H 1116
+1.9%
Xeon E-2176M 1095

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-8750H 173
Xeon E-2176M 187
+8.1%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8750H 1.98
Xeon E-2176M 2.04
+3%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8750H 7
+2.2%
Xeon E-2176M 6.9

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 2% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8750H 5310
+14.8%
Xeon E-2176M 4625

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 15% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8750H 200
Xeon E-2176M 204
+1.6%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Core i7-8750H by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8750H 67
+6.6%
Xeon E-2176M 63

Core i7-8750H outperforms Xeon E-2176M by 7% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 6.46 7.09
Integrated graphics card 3.08
Cost $395 $450

We couldn't decide between Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Core i7-8750H is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2176M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8750H and Xeon E-2176M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8750H
Core i7-8750H
Intel Xeon E-2176M
Xeon E-2176M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1028 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-8750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 154 votes

Rate Intel Xeon E-2176M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8750H or Xeon E-2176M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.