Xeon E5-2640 vs i7-8700K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8700K
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.58
+117%
Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96

Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8751425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.443.66
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency8.553.94
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-8700K has 21% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s7.2 GT/s
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB384 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8700K 8.58
+117%
Xeon E5-2640 3.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8700K 13622
+116%
Xeon E5-2640 6294

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-8700K 1610
+257%
Xeon E5-2640 451

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-8700K 6513
+183%
Xeon E5-2640 2299

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.58 3.96
Recency 5 October 2017 6 March 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

i7-8700K has a 116.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-8700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-8700K is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700K and Xeon E5-2640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8700K
Core i7-8700K
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2632 votes

Rate Core i7-8700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1096 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8700K or Xeon E5-2640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.