i3-3250 vs i7-8700K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8700K
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.74
+457%
Core i3-3250
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.57

Core i7-8700K outperforms Core i3-3250 by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8752120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.510.15
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency8.542.65
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)9 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359$138

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-8700K has 2907% better value for money than i3-3250.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 2500
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8700K 8.74
+457%
i3-3250 1.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8700K 13622
+458%
i3-3250 2442

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-8700K 1610
+176%
i3-3250 583

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-8700K 6512
+448%
i3-3250 1189

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.74 1.57
Integrated graphics card 3.09 0.69
Recency 5 October 2017 9 June 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 55 Watt

i7-8700K has a 456.7% higher aggregate performance score, 347.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3250, on the other hand, has 72.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-8700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700K and Core i3-3250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8700K
Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i3-3250
Core i3-3250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2618 votes

Rate Core i7-8700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 198 votes

Rate Core i3-3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8700K or Core i3-3250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.