Core i3-6320 vs Core i7-8700
Aggregate performance score
i7-8700 outperforms i3-6320 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 882 | 1611 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.70 | 0.59 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Core i3 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 24 September 2017 (6 years ago) | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $303 | $157 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-8700 has 1714% better value for money than i3-6320.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | 98.57 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-6320 by 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-6320 by 185% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-6320 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-6320 by 126% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.31 | 2.92 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 2.59 |
| Recency | 24 September 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
i7-8700 has a 184.6% higher aggregate performance score, 19.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
i3-6320, on the other hand, has 27.5% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-8700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6320 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700 and Core i3-6320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
