Solo T1350 vs i7-870

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-870
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.98
+1550%
Core Solo T1350
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.12

Core i7-870 outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a whopping 1550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19423358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCore Solo
Power efficiency1.970.42
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$305no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size296 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors774 million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.262V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-870 1.98
+1550%
Solo T1350 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-870 3141
+1519%
Solo T1350 194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.98 0.12
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 31 Watt

i7-870 has a 1550% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Solo T1350, on the other hand, has 206.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-870 is a desktop processor while Core Solo T1350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-870 and Core Solo T1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-870
Core i7-870
Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1122 votes

Rate Core i7-870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-870 or Core Solo T1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.