i5-760 vs i7-860S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-860S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.44
Core i5-760
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.66
+15.3%

Core i5-760 outperforms Core i7-860S by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-860S and Core i5-760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21792066
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.040.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.661.65
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)18 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$422$230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-760 has 150% better value for money than i7-860S.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-860S and Core i5-760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s2.5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors774 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-860S and Core i5-760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-860S and Core i5-760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-860S and Core i5-760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-860S and Core i5-760 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-860S and Core i5-760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-860S and Core i5-760.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-860S 1.44
i5-760 1.66
+15.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-860S 2280
i5-760 2633
+15.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-860S 421
i5-760 451
+7.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-860S 1276
+0.8%
i5-760 1266

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 1.66
Recency 7 January 2010 18 July 2010
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 95 Watt

i7-860S has 100% more threads, and 15.9% lower power consumption.

i5-760, on the other hand, has a 15.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

The Core i5-760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-860S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-860S and Core i5-760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-860S
Core i7-860S
Intel Core i5-760
Core i5-760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Core i7-860S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 753 votes

Rate Core i5-760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-860S or Core i5-760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.