Celeron G555 vs i7-860

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-860
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.89
+117%
Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87

Core i7-860 outperforms Celeron G555 by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19702551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.190.05
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.881.27
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-860 has 280% better value for money than Celeron G555.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C69 °C
Number of transistors774 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-860 and Celeron G555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-860 and Celeron G555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-860 and Celeron G555 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-860 and Celeron G555.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-860 1.89
+117%
Celeron G555 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-860 3000
+116%
Celeron G555 1388

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 0.87
Recency 8 September 2009 1 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

i7-860 has a 117.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-860 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G555 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-860 and Celeron G555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-860
Core i7-860
Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 755 votes

Rate Core i7-860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-860 or Celeron G555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.