Core i5-1135G7 vs Core i7-8500Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8500Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
2.32
Core i5-1135G7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
6.34
+173%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1710995
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Tiger Lake-UP3
Release date30 August 2018 (5 years ago)2 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393no data
Current price$1163 (3x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP--
Smart Response+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840 x 2160@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8500Y 2.32
i5-1135G7 6.34
+173%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 173% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-8500Y 3590
i5-1135G7 9809
+173%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 173% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-8500Y 5027
i5-1135G7 8116
+61.4%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 61% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8500Y 8706
i5-1135G7 25271
+190%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 190% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8500Y 3056
i5-1135G7 8274
+171%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 171% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-8500Y 15.51
i5-1135G7 6.66
+133%

Core i7-8500Y outperforms Core i5-1135G7 by 133% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-8500Y 2
i5-1135G7 9
+273%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 273% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-8500Y 247
i5-1135G7 822
+233%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 233% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-8500Y 131
i5-1135G7 198
+51.7%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 52% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8500Y 1.45
i5-1135G7 2.33
+60.7%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 61% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8500Y 2.2
i5-1135G7 5.2
+136%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 136% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8500Y 2483
i5-1135G7 5283
+113%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 113% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8500Y 14
i5-1135G7 41
+194%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 194% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8500Y 83
i5-1135G7 183
+119%

Core i5-1135G7 outperforms Core i7-8500Y by 119% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 6.34
Recency 30 August 2018 2 September 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 28 Watt

The Core i5-1135G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-8500Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8500Y and Core i5-1135G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8500Y
Core i7-8500Y
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Core i5-1135G7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 30 votes

Rate Core i7-8500Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3962 votes

Rate Core i5-1135G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8500Y or Core i5-1135G7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.