Celeron N4500 vs i7-8500Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8500Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
2.26
+82.3%
Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.24

Core i7-8500Y outperforms Celeron N4500 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18272314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency42.5519.46
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date28 August 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840 x 2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes108
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8500Y 2.26
+82.3%
Celeron N4500 1.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8500Y 3590
+82.7%
Celeron N4500 1965

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-8500Y 3056
+48.9%
Celeron N4500 2053

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-8500Y 15.51
+224%
Celeron N4500 50.2

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-8500Y 2
+18.6%
Celeron N4500 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-8500Y 247
+44.2%
Celeron N4500 171

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-8500Y 131
+59.1%
Celeron N4500 82

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i7-8500Y 1.45
+39.4%
Celeron N4500 1.04

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-8500Y 2.2
+100%
Celeron N4500 1.1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i7-8500Y 14
+17.1%
Celeron N4500 12

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i7-8500Y 83
+37.5%
Celeron N4500 61

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-8500Y 2483
+131%
Celeron N4500 1076

Blender(-)

i7-8500Y 1966
Celeron N4500 4249
+116%

7-Zip Single

i7-8500Y 4368
+53.1%
Celeron N4500 2853

7-Zip

i7-8500Y 10709
+98.5%
Celeron N4500 5394

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 1.24
Integrated graphics card 1.98 5.58
Recency 28 August 2018 11 January 2021
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 6 Watt

i7-8500Y has a 82.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 20% lower power consumption.

Celeron N4500, on the other hand, has 181.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-8500Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8500Y and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8500Y
Core i7-8500Y
Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 31 vote

Rate Core i7-8500Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 738 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8500Y or Celeron N4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.