i3-2310E vs i7-840QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-840QM
2010, $568
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.16
+10.5%
Core i3-2310E
2011, $225
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.05

Core i7-840QM outperforms Core i3-2310E by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26122697
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.030.07
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i3
Power efficiency1.091.27
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date22 June 2010 (15 years ago)1 February 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-2310E has 133% better value for money than i7-840QM.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate2.5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1421
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneIntel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-840QM 1.16
+10.5%
i3-2310E 1.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-840QM 2038
+10.5%
Samples: 256
i3-2310E 1845
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 1.05
Recency 22 June 2010 1 February 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-840QM has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-2310E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 41% more advanced lithography process, and 29% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-840QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-2310E in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 91 votes

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Core i3-2310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-840QM and Core i3-2310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.