Ryzen 9 4900H vs i7-820QM
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i7-820QM by a whopping 977% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2394 | 635 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 2.36 | 21.14 |
| Architecture codename | Clarksfield (2009−2010) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| Release date | 23 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 16 March 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $546 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 13 | 33 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 774 million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCPGA988,PGA988 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 68.27 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | None | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H.
| PCIe version | 2 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.12 | 12.06 |
| Recency | 23 September 2009 | 16 March 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 54 Watt |
i7-820QM has 20% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 4900H, on the other hand, has a 976.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 4900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-820QM in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-820QM and Ryzen 9 4900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
