Ryzen Embedded V2748 vs Core i7-7820X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-7820X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads
11.12
+3%
Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
10.80

Core i7-7820X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking632651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation9.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen Embedded
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Renoir (2020−2022)
Release date26 June 2017 (6 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599no data
Current price$357 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.25 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature99 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066FP6
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s68.269 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics 448SP

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-7820X 11.12
+3%
Ryzen Embedded V2748 10.80

Core i7-7820X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-7820X 17194
+2.9%
Ryzen Embedded V2748 16706

Core i7-7820X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 11.12 10.80
Recency 26 June 2017 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7820X and Ryzen Embedded V2748, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7820X
Core i7-7820X
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748
Ryzen Embedded V2748

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 121 vote

Rate Core i7-7820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 15 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2748 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7820X or Ryzen Embedded V2748, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.