A4-9120C vs i7-7820X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-7820X
2017, $599
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.82
+1825%

Core i7-7820X outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 1825% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9543176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.963.59
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date26 June 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3616
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache11 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature99 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2066BGA
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Virtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes28no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-7820X 9.82
+1825%
A4-9120C 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-7820X 17193
+1860%
Samples: 1349
A4-9120C 877
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.82 0.51
Recency 26 June 2017 6 January 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 6 Watt

i7-7820X has a 1825.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2233.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-7820X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-7820X is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7820X
Core i7-7820X
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 169 votes

Rate Core i7-7820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 100 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-7820X and A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.