i5-9300HF vs i7-7820EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-7820EQ
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.53
+3%
Core i5-9300HF
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.40

Core i7-7820EQ outperforms Core i5-9300HF by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14241449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.764.65
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i5
Power efficiency4.033.91
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)30 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-9300HF has 512% better value for money than i7-7820EQ.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s DMI
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s41.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-7820EQ 4.53
+3%
i5-9300HF 4.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-7820EQ 7542
+3%
i5-9300HF 7319

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-7820EQ 746
i5-9300HF 1288
+72.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-7820EQ 1922
i5-9300HF 3734
+94.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.53 4.40
Recency 3 January 2017 30 April 2019

i7-7820EQ has a 3% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-9300HF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i7-7820EQ and Intel Core i5-9300HF.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7820EQ
Core i7-7820EQ
Intel Core i5-9300HF
Core i5-9300HF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-7820EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 290 votes

Rate Core i5-9300HF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-7820EQ and Core i5-9300HF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.