Celeron M U3400 vs i7-7700K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1081not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency6.31no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2500 MHz
Multiplier42no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-7700K 7305
+506%
Celeron M U3400 1205

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-7700K 28903
+1147%
Celeron M U3400 2317

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-7700K 10156
+928%
Celeron M U3400 988

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-7700K 5.56
+1019%
Celeron M U3400 62.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 18 Watt

i7-7700K has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has 405.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-7700K is a desktop processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700K and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7700K
Core i7-7700K
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 3176 votes

Rate Core i7-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7700K or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.