Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core i7-7700K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-7700K
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 91 Watt
6.24
+661%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.82

i7-7700K outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 661% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10492541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)26 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier42no data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-7700K 6.24
+661%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-7700K 9650
+657%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-7700K 7305
+254%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-7700K 28903
+605%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-7700K 10156
+477%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-7700K 5.56
+592%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 38.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.24 0.82
Recency 3 January 2017 26 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 35 Watt

i7-7700K has a 661% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-7700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-7700K is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700K and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-7700K
Core i7-7700K
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3060 votes

Rate Core i7-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 101 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7700K or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.