Atom 230 vs i7-740QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-740QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.15
+945%
Atom 230
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.11

Core i7-740QM outperforms Atom 230 by a whopping 945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-740QM and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23703361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.422.60
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$29

Detailed specifications

Core i7-740QM and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.73 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0FSB
Bus rate2.5 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier1312
L1 cache256 KB56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Number of transistors774 million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-740QM and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-740QM and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNone-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-740QM and Atom 230.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-740QM 1.15
+945%
Atom 230 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-740QM 1833
+985%
Atom 230 169

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-740QM 3082
+453%
Atom 230 557

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-740QM 8930
+949%
Atom 230 851

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 0.11
Recency 22 June 2010 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 4 Watt

i7-740QM has a 945.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom 230, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-740QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-740QM and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-740QM
Core i7-740QM
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 157 votes

Rate Core i7-740QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-740QM or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.