Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs i7-720QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-720QM
2009, $546
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
0.96
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.86
+302%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Core i7-720QM by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27501651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency0.9010.87
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date23 September 2009 (16 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1220
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors774 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-720QM 0.96
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 3.86
+302%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-720QM 1675
Samples: 2968
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6767
+304%
Samples: 117

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 3.86
Recency 23 September 2009 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 302.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-720QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-720QM is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-720QM
Core i7-720QM
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 217 votes

Rate Core i7-720QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-720QM and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.