Xeon X5670 vs Core i7-6950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6950X
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
11.26
+186%

i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6481373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.531.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Xeon (Desktop)
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$67
Current price$687 (0.4x MSRP)$44 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-6950X has 139% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPI6400 MHz
L1 cache32K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature67°81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB288 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6950X 11.26
+186%
Xeon X5670 3.94

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-6950X 17418
+186%
Xeon X5670 6089

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 186% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-6950X 1302
+170%
Xeon X5670 482

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 170% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-6950X 8480
+273%
Xeon X5670 2272

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 273% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-6950X 6231
+68.5%
Xeon X5670 3698

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 68% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-6950X 40378
+102%
Xeon X5670 19954

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 102% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-6950X 10658
+83.9%
Xeon X5670 5794

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 84% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-6950X 20
+165%
Xeon X5670 8

Core i7-6950X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 165% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.26 3.94
Recency 31 May 2016 16 March 2010
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Cost $1723 $67
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-6950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6950X is a desktop processor while Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6950X and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6950X
Core i7-6950X
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 221 vote

Rate Core i7-6950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 465 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6950X or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.