Xeon E5-4650 v4 vs i7-6950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6950X
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
11.25
+9.6%
Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
10.26

i7-6950X outperforms Xeon E5-4650 v4 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking684745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.882.73
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Broadwell (2014−2019)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$3,838

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 210% better value for money than i7-6950X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2028
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate9.6 GT/s / QPI2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache320 KBno data
L2 cache2.5 MB3.5 MB
L3 cache25 MB35 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6950X 11.25
+9.6%
Xeon E5-4650 v4 10.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6950X 17402
+9.6%
Xeon E5-4650 v4 15871

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.25 10.26
Recency 10 March 2016 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 14
Threads 20 28
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 105 Watt

i7-6950X has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon E5-4650 v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 40% more physical cores and 40% more threads, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4.

Note that Core i7-6950X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4650 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6950X and Xeon E5-4650 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6950X
Core i7-6950X
Intel Xeon E5-4650 v4
Xeon E5-4650 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 245 votes

Rate Core i7-6950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6950X or Xeon E5-4650 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.