Xeon E5450 vs i7-6900K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6900K
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.11
+462%

Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E5450 by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8352083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency6.161.92
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)no data
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,020no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHzno data
L1 cache32 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6900K 9.11
+462%
Xeon E5450 1.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6900K 14470
+461%
Xeon E5450 2580

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6900K 1286
+231%
Xeon E5450 388

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6900K 7200
+556%
Xeon E5450 1097

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.11 1.62
Recency 31 May 2016 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 80 Watt

i7-6900K has a 462.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5450, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5450 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6900K is a desktop processor while Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and Xeon E5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 112 votes

Rate Core i7-6900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1285 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6900K or Xeon E5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.