FX-8350 vs i7-6900K

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6900K and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	834	1475
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.96	0.76
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	AMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency	6.16	2.83
Architecture codename	Broadwell-E (2016)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,020	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-6900K has 26% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6900K and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	16	8
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	4 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	4.2 GHz
L1 cache	32 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	8192 KB
L3 cache	20 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	+
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6900K and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6900K and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Response	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-6900K and FX-8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6900K and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6900K and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	128 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6900K and FX-8350.

PCIe version	3.0	n/a
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	9.11	3.74
Recency	31 May 2016	23 October 2012
Threads	16	8
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6900K and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---