A10-6700 vs i7-6822EQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6822EQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.42
+68.5%

Core i7-6822EQ outperforms A10-6700 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15741933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency12.472.85
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFM2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6822EQ 3.42
+68.5%
A10-6700 2.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6822EQ 5241
+68.8%
A10-6700 3105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 2.03
Integrated graphics card 2.59 1.38
Recency 12 October 2015 1 June 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

i7-6822EQ has a 68.5% higher aggregate performance score, 87.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6822EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-6822EQ is a notebook processor while A10-6700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6822EQ and A10-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6822EQ
Core i7-6822EQ
AMD A10-6700
A10-6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-6822EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 242 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6822EQ or A10-6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.