Core i5-8250U vs Core i7-6820HQ

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-6820HQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads
4.42
+11.1%
Core i5-8250U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
3.98

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12451334
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)21 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$297
Current price$768 (2x MSRP)$668 (2.2x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2123 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
Smart Response++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s37.5 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics 620
Max video memory64 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6820HQ 4.42
+11.1%
i5-8250U 3.98

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-6820HQ 6832
+10.9%
i5-8250U 6158

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-6820HQ 1097
+42.3%
i5-8250U 771

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-6820HQ 3443
+74.7%
i5-8250U 1971

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 75% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-6820HQ 5429
i5-8250U 5533
+1.9%

Core i5-8250U outperforms Core i7-6820HQ by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-6820HQ 20868
+16%
i5-8250U 17987

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-6820HQ 6866
+8.2%
i5-8250U 6348

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 8% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-6820HQ 7.9
+2%
i5-8250U 8.06

Core i5-8250U outperforms Core i7-6820HQ by 2% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-6820HQ 8
+29.1%
i5-8250U 6

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 29% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-6820HQ 704
+25.3%
i5-8250U 562

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 25% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-6820HQ 153
+7%
i5-8250U 143

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 7% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-6820HQ 1.72
+4.9%
i5-8250U 1.64

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-6820HQ 3.9
+11.4%
i5-8250U 3.5

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 11% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-6820HQ 3642
i5-8250U 3991
+9.6%

Core i5-8250U outperforms Core i7-6820HQ by 10% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-6820HQ 164
+19.2%
i5-8250U 138

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 19% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-6820HQ 44
+38.1%
i5-8250U 32

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 38% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-6820HQ 3668
+13.1%
i5-8250U 3242

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 13% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-6820HQ 13090
+2.7%
i5-8250U 12742

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 3% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

i7-6820HQ 13339
+10%
i5-8250U 12131

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 10% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

i7-6820HQ 4257
+5.7%
i5-8250U 4029

Core i7-6820HQ outperforms Core i5-8250U by 6% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.42 3.98
Integrated graphics card 2.59 2.42
Recency 1 September 2015 21 August 2017
Cost $378 $297
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

The Core i7-6820HQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-8250U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820HQ and Core i5-8250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6820HQ
Core i7-6820HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Core i5-8250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 381 vote

Rate Core i7-6820HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2689 votes

Rate Core i5-8250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6820HQ or Core i5-8250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.