Xeon Gold 6538N vs Core i7-6820EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6820EQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.53
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
29.03
+541%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms i7-6820EQ by a whopping 541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1253143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Emerald Rapids
Release date12 October 2015 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data
Current price$2806 (7.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size122 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6820EQ 4.53
Xeon Gold 6538N 29.03
+541%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms Core i7-6820EQ by 541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-6820EQ 7001
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895
+541%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms Core i7-6820EQ by 541% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.53 29.03
Recency 12 October 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6538N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6820EQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-6820EQ is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6820EQ
Core i7-6820EQ
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core i7-6820EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6820EQ or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.