FX-9590 vs Core i7-6800K
Aggregated performance score
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Core i7-6800K and FX-9590 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 913 | 942 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 4.55 | 3.21 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-E (2016) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (7 years ago) | 6 July 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $345 | no data |
| Current price | $169 (0.5x MSRP) | $190 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-6800K has 42% better value for money than FX-9590.
Technical specs
Core i7-6800K and FX-9590 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67° | 57 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6800K and FX-9590 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6800K and FX-9590. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-6800K and FX-9590 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6800K and FX-9590 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6800K and FX-9590. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6800K and FX-9590.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 6% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 125% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 162% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-9590 by 65% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 6.96 | 6.59 |
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 6 July 2013 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 220 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core i7-6800K and FX-9590. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6800K and FX-9590, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
