Athlon X4 760K vs i7-6700TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700TE
2015, $303
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.52
+108%

Core i7-6700TE outperforms Athlon X4 760K by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16902264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency10.781.81
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date19 October 2015 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$303no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache256 KB192K
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket1151FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-6700TE 3.52
+108%
Athlon X4 760K 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-6700TE 6203
+108%
Samples: 54
Athlon X4 760K 2978
Samples: 351

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-6700TE 1028
+125%
Athlon X4 760K 457

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-6700TE 3154
+184%
Athlon X4 760K 1112

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.52 1.69
Recency 19 October 2015 1 June 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

i7-6700TE has a 108.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-6700TE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X4 760K in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700TE
Core i7-6700TE
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Core i7-6700TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 297 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-6700TE and Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.