Atom C3958 vs i7-6700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.08
+106%
Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.47

Core i7-6700 outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12091750
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.030.55
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency7.407.54
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 July 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$303$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-6700 has 87% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3420
L1 cache64 KB (per core)896 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size64 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6700 5.08
+106%
Atom C3958 2.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6700 8075
+106%
Atom C3958 3929

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.08 2.47
Recency 1 July 2015 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 31 Watt

i7-6700 has a 105.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 109.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6700 is a desktop processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700
Core i7-6700
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1624 votes

Rate Core i7-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6700 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.