Intel Celeron J1850 vs Core i7-640UM

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

i7-640UM
0.77
+26.2%

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron J1850 by 26% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24962638
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years old)1 September 2013 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$305$82
Current price$1359 (4.5x MSRP)no data

Technical specs

Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.27 GHz2 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB224 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHz792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640UM 0.77
+26.2%
Celeron J1850 0.61

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron J1850 by 26% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-640UM 1183
+25.6%
Celeron J1850 942

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron J1850 by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.77 0.61
Recency 7 January 2010 1 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Cost $305 $82
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

The Core i7-640UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640UM and Celeron J1850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640UM
Core i7-640UM
Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 7 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-640UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Intel Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640UM or Celeron J1850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.