Intel Celeron 3215U vs Core i7-640UM

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

i7-640UM
0.77
+4.1%

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron 3215U by 4% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24962535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years old)1 June 2015 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$305$107
Current price$1359 (4.5x MSRP)$256 (2.4x MSRP)

Technical specs

Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.27 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSXno data-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHz850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640UM 0.77
+4.1%
Celeron 3215U 0.74

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron 3215U by 4% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-640UM 1183
+4.6%
Celeron 3215U 1131

Core i7-640UM outperforms Celeron 3215U by 5% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-640UM 226
Celeron 3215U 332
+46.9%

Celeron 3215U outperforms Core i7-640UM by 47% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-640UM 442
Celeron 3215U 587
+32.8%

Celeron 3215U outperforms Core i7-640UM by 33% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.77 0.74
Recency 7 January 2010 1 June 2015
Threads 4 2
Cost $305 $107
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640UM and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640UM
Core i7-640UM
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 7 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-640UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 23 votes

Rate Intel Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640UM or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.