Pentium P6300 vs i7-640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.30
+145%
Pentium P6300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Core i7-640M outperforms Pentium P6300 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22652858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Pentium
Power efficiency3.521.43
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)9 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier2117
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors384 million384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288,PGA988PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.30
+145%
Pentium P6300 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-640M 2070
+148%
Pentium P6300 834

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 0.53
Recency 1 September 2010 9 January 2011
Threads 4 2

i7-640M has a 145.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Pentium P6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Core i7-640M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and Pentium P6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
Intel Pentium P6300
Pentium P6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 523 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Pentium P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or Pentium P6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.