Pentium 4 660 vs i7-640M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.31
+524%
Pentium 4 660
1 core / 1 thread, 115 Watt
0.21

Core i7-640M outperforms Pentium 4 660 by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22773209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Pentium 4
Power efficiency3.540.17
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Prescott 2M
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C71 °C
Number of transistors384 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288,PGA988PLGA775,PPGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.31
+524%
Pentium 4 660 0.21

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-640M 17.62
+377%
Pentium 4 660 84

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 115 Watt

i7-640M has a 523.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-640M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 660 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-640M is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and Pentium 4 660, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
Intel Pentium 4 660
Pentium 4 660

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 524 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Pentium 4 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or Pentium 4 660, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.