Core i5-8400H vs Core i7-640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.34
Core i5-8400H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.96
+270%

i5-8400H outperforms i7-640M by a whopping 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21591160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2010 (13 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$250
Current price$524 (1.5x MSRP)$1171 (4.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors384 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPPno data+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s41.8 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency766 MHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.34
i5-8400H 4.96
+270%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-640M 2076
i5-8400H 7669
+269%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 269% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-640M 424
i5-8400H 1303
+207%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 207% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-640M 799
i5-8400H 3673
+360%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 360% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-640M 3708
i5-8400H 6659
+79.6%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 80% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-640M 7906
i5-8400H 21711
+175%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 175% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-640M 17.62
i5-8400H 7.2
+145%

Core i7-640M outperforms Core i5-8400H by 145% in wPrime 32.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-640M 1.3
i5-8400H 4.6
+254%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 254% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-640M 1763
i5-8400H 5391
+206%

Core i5-8400H outperforms Core i7-640M by 206% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 4.96
Recency 1 September 2010 2 April 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Cost $346 $250
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

The Core i5-8400H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-640M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and Core i5-8400H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
Intel Core i5-8400H
Core i5-8400H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 499 votes

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 144 votes

Rate Core i5-8400H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or Core i5-8400H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.