i3-L13G4 vs i7-620UM
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-L13G4 outperforms Core i7-620UM by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3142 | 2446 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 0.84 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Ice Lake |
| Power efficiency | 1.46 | 9.28 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Lakefield (2020) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (16 years ago) | June 2020 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $278 | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-L13G4 has 8300% better value for money than i7-620UM.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 5 |
| Base clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 8 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 4,050 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | FC-CSP1016 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | 34 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DX12 |
| OpenGL | no data | OpenGL4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i3-L13G4.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 1.58 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.72 | 5.17 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 5 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 7 Watt |
i3-L13G4 has a 147% higher aggregate performance score, 618% faster integrated GPU, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 157% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i3-L13G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-620UM in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
