Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i7-620M

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2173	2175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.00
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i7	no data
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$332	no data
Current price	$254 (0.8x MSRP)	$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.33 GHz	2.5 GHz
Bus support	2500 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	6 MB (shared)
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	81+114 mm2	2x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	71 °C
Number of transistors	384 million	456 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	BGA1288,PGA988	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	+	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
FSB parity	no data	+
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.1 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors	no data
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	766 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i7-620M outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9300 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.28	1.27
Physical cores	2	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620M and Core 2 Quad Q9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---