Pentium G620 vs i7-610E

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2703	3077
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	7.43
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i7	no data
Power efficiency	1.43	0.46
Designer	Intel	Intel
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	7 January 2010 (16 years ago)	22 May 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$332	$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G620 has 18475% better value for money than i7-610E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i7-610E and Pentium G620: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.53 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	no data
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	19	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	81 mm2	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	69 °C
Number of transistors	382 million	504 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-610E and Pentium G620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	BGA1288	FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-610E and Pentium G620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	+
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	+	+
Fast Memory Access	+	+

Security technologies

Core i7-610E and Pentium G620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-610E and Pentium G620 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-610E and Pentium G620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-800, DDR3-1066	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8.79 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.051 GB/s	17 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors	Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	-
Graphics max frequency	766 MHz	1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-610E and Pentium G620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-610E and Pentium G620.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.21	0.73
Recency	7 January 2010	22 May 2011
Threads	4	2
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt