Pentium G4600 vs Core i7-5930K
Aggregate performance score
i7-5930K outperforms Pentium G4600 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1004 | 1755 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.84 | 1.44 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-E (2014) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2014 (9 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $613 | $87 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Pentium G4600 has 71% better value for money than i7-5930K.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 2011-3 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.67 | 2.33 |
| Recency | 1 September 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 51 Watt |
i7-5930K has a 186.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Pentium G4600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 174.5% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-5930K is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4600 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5930K and Pentium G4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
