Xeon Gold 6138T vs i7-5820K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-5820K
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
6.20
Xeon Gold 6138T
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.00
+110%

Xeon Gold 6138T outperforms Core i7-5820K by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1076574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.133.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency4.199.84
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date1 September 2014 (10 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$410$2,742

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6138T has 188% better value for money than i7-5820K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1240
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.25 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)20 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)27.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C94 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-5820K 6.20
Xeon Gold 6138T 13.00
+110%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-5820K 9846
Xeon Gold 6138T 20649
+110%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.20 13.00
Recency 1 September 2014 25 April 2017
Physical cores 6 20
Threads 12 40
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138T has a 109.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 233.3% more physical cores and 233.3% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6138T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5820K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-5820K is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6138T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5820K and Xeon Gold 6138T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5820K
Core i7-5820K
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 387 votes

Rate Core i7-5820K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6138T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5820K or Xeon Gold 6138T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.