Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Core i7-5820K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-5820K
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
6.36
+378%

i7-5820K outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10012168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.160.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E7
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 September 2014 (9 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$410$7,174
Current price$247 (0.6x MSRP)$282 (0x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-5820K has 1864% better value for money than Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus supportno data3 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C79 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data46 Bit
Instruction Replayno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GB3 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2832

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-5820K 6.36
+378%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.33

Core i7-5820K outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by 378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-5820K 9839
+379%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054

Core i7-5820K outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by 379% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.36 1.33
Recency 1 September 2014 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 48
Cost $410 $7174
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 165 Watt

The Core i7-5820K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-5820K is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5820K and Xeon E7-8890 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5820K
Core i7-5820K
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 353 votes

Rate Core i7-5820K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 26 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5820K or Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.