Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs i7-5820K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-5820K
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
6.20
+40.9%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.40

Core i7-5820K outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10891348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.20no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency4.196.41
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2014 (10 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$410no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size356 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-5820K 6.20
+40.9%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-5820K 9842
+40.8%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6989

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.20 4.40
Recency 1 September 2014 30 September 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

i7-5820K has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-5820K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5820K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5820K
Core i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 389 votes

Rate Core i7-5820K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 147 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5820K or Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.