Ryzen 7 1700 vs i7-4960X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-4960X by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1059 | 816 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.48 | 3.95 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 4.60 | 13.58 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 3 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 22 February 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $329 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 7 1700 has 723% better value for money than i7-4960X.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 16384 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,860 million | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA3 |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| SenseMI | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.32 | 9.33 |
| Recency | 3 September 2013 | 22 February 2017 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1700 has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4960X in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4960X and Ryzen 7 1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
